Social Business Performance: Is it Possible to measure? Review and Research Agenda

Tatiani Schmitt; Anete Alberton

doi:10.24857/rgsa.v16.2858

Authors

Tatiani Schmitt Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, Santa Catarina, (Brasil). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-0455
Anete Alberton Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, Santa Catarina, (Brasil). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6477-0122

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v16.2858

Keywords:

Social business, Performance, Social and economic performance, Systematic review

Abstract

Objective: This article proposes a systematic review of the literature on social business performance (SBP) measures to analyze its current panorama of studies and propose a research agenda.

Methodology: A mixed approach, quantitative regarding the use of descriptive statistical analysis, and qualitative regarding the content analysis. The research considered 241 peer-reviewed journal articles extracted from the Scopus database in English from 2010 to 2021, of which 34 comprised the qualitative analysis.

Results and Conclusion: The results reveal a growing interest in this field of research in recent years, especially from 2017 to 2020. Most studies on SBP are concentrated in North America, specifically in the United States (52 articles). Subjective scales are the most frequent as SBP measures, and the scale developed by Miles et al. (2014), which addresses economic and social performance, was the one that stood out the most in the studies. Of the 34 articles that constituted the qualitative analysis, a research agenda composed of four categories can be established.

Research implications: The study contributes to research in social business, primarily social and economic performance, evidencing a perception of the evolution of SBP studies in the last ten years.

Originality/value: It presents the objective and subjective SBP measures adopted in scientific production. It also presents an agenda for future research that covers the application of studies in other contexts and sectors. The research focused on longitudinal studies, quantifiable and objective measures, and comparisons between social and traditional businesses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Tatiani Schmitt, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, Santa Catarina, (Brasil).

Master and Doctoral Student in Administration - Universidade do Vale do Itajaí (PPGA/UNIVALI)

Anete Alberton, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, Santa Catarina, (Brasil).

PhD in Production Engineering – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

References

Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., Lazzarini, S. G., Vassolo, R. S., Amorós, J. E., & Allen, D. G. (2020). Conducting management research in Latin America: why and what’s in it for you? Journal of Management, 46(5), 615-636. doi:10.1177/0149206320901581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901581

Alarifi, G., Robson, P., & Kromidha, E. (2019). The Manifestation of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Social Entrepreneurship Context. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(3), 307-327. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2018.1541015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1541015

Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Bengo, I. (2015). Performance measurement for social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 649-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9436-8

Arogyaswamy, B. (2017). Social entrepreneurship performance measurement: A time-based organizing framework. Business Horizons, 60(5), 603-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.004

Asmalovskij, A., Sadílek, T., Hinčica, V., & Mizerová, M. (2019). Performance of social enterprises in the Czech Republic. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(1),19-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1521865

Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B., & Hatfield, J.D. (1985). An empirical-examination of the relationship between corporate social-responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256210

Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2011). Measuring performance in social enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 149-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009351111

Baker, C., Courtney, P., Kubinakova, K., Crone, D., & Billingham, D. (2020). Assessing the broader social outcomes of a community health programme through a social-ecological framework. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 58(3), 137-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2020.1719861

Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de Conteúdo (1a ed.). São Paulo: Edições 70.

Bellucci, M., Bagnoli, L., Biggeri, M., & Rinaldi, V. (2012). Performance measurement in solidarity economy organizations: The case of fair trade shops in Italy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(1), 25-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00453.x

Bhattarai, C. R., Kwong, C. C., & Tasavori, M. (2019). Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Research, 96, 47-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.042

Brandle, L., Golla, S., & Kuckertz, A. (2019). How entrepreneurial orientation translates social identities into performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(7), 1433-1451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2018-0804

Castellas, E. I., Ormiston, J., & Findlay, S. (2018). Financing social entrepreneurship: The role of impact investment in shaping social enterprise in Australia. Social Enterprise Journal, 14(2), 130-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-02-2017-0006

Creswell, J. W. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007.

Crucke, S., & Decramer, A. (2016). The development of a measurement instrument for the organizational performance of social enterprises. Sustainability, 8(2), 161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020161

Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship.

Dia, M., & Bozec, R. (2019). Social enterprises and the performance measurement challenge: Could the data envelopment analysis be the solution? Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 26(5-6), 265-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1666

Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What Impact? A Framework for Measuring the Scale and Scope of Social Performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.118

Figueiró, P. S., & Bessi, V. G. (2020). Sentido do Trabalho: A Percepção de Empreendedores Sociais de Cooperativas de Reciclagem. Gestão & Conexões, 9(1), 50-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13071/regec.2317-5087.2020.9.1.27379.50-72

Grimes, M. (2010). Strategic sensemaking within funding relationships: The effects of performance measurement on organizational identity in the social sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 763-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00398.x

Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2020). Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 209-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.032

Halberstadt, J., Niemand, T., Kraus, S., Rexhepi, G., Jones, P., & Kailer, N. (2020). Social entrepreneurship orientation: Drivers of success for start-ups and established industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.06.012

Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2016). Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 643-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2449-4

Kassim, E. S., Tajmi, T. A. M., Hairuddin, H., Malik, A. M. A., & Tobi, S. U. M. (2020). Mapping social enterprise to sustainable development goals. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 19(2), 209-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2020.106674

Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0344

Lee, E. K. M., & Chandra, Y. (2020). Dynamic and Marketing Capabilities as Predictors of Social Enterprises’ Performance. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00155-y

Liu, G., Eng, T. Y., & Takeda, S. (2015). An investigation of marketing capabilities and social enterprise performance in the UK and Japan. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 39(2), 267-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12041

López-Penabad, M. C., Maside-Sanfiz, J. M., Torrelles Manent, J., & Iglesias-Casal, A. (2020). Application of the DEA Double Bootstrap to Analyze Efficiency in Galician Sheltered Workshops. Sustainability, 12(16), 6625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166625

Lückenbach, F., Baumgarth, C., Schmidt, H. J., & Henseler, J. (2019). To perform or not to perform? How strategic orientations influence the performance of Social Entrepreneurship Organizations. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1647820

Luke, B., Barraket, J., & Eversole, R. (2013). Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures: Performance evaluation of social enterprise. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(3-4), 234-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-08-2012-0034

Lumpkin, G. T., Moss, T. W., Gras, D. M., Kato, S., & Amezcua, A. S. (2013). Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: how are they different, if at all?. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 761-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9399-3

Mamabolo, A., & Myres, K. (2020). Performance Measurement in Emerging Market Social Enterprises using a Balanced Scorecard. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 65-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1561499

Mersland, R., Nyarko, S. A., & Szafarz, A. (2019). Do social enterprises walk the talk? Assessing microfinance performances with mission statements. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11, e00117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00117

Miles, M. P., Verreynne, M. L., & Luke, B. (2014). Social enterprises and the performance advantages of a Vincentian marketing orientation. Journal of business ethics, 123(4), 549-556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2009-3

Miles, M., Verreynne, M. L., Luke, B., Eversole, R., & Barracket, J. (2013). The relationship of entrepreneurial orientation, Vincentian values and economic and social performance in social enterprise. Review of Business, 33(2), 91-102.

Millar, R., & Hall, K. (2013). Social return on investment (SROI) and performance measurement: The opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care. Public Management Review, 15(6), 923-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.698857

Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012a). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of management review, 37(4), 616-640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0456

Miller, T. L., Wesley, C. L., & Williams, D. E. (2012b). Educating the minds of caring hearts: Comparing the views of practitioners and educators on the importance of social entrepreneurship competencies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 349-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0017

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Mouchamps, H. (2014). Weighing elephants with kitchen scales: The relevance of traditional performance measurement tools for social enterprises. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(6), 727-745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2013-0158

Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre–paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(4), 611-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x

Okano, M. T. (2020). A contribuição das Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação (TICs) para a criação de valor nas empresas sociais (Doctoral dissertation).

Pinheiro, P., Daniel, A., & Moreira, A. (2020). Social Enterprise Performance: The Role of Market and Social Entrepreneurship Orientations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00266-x

Prochazkova, P. T., & Noskova, M. (2020). An application of input-output analysis to social enterprises: a case of the Czech Republic. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(4), 495-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2019-0114

Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Stakeholders matter: How social enterprises address mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 307-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2353-y

Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 82-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717727718

Richardson, S. M., Kettinger, W. J., Banks, M. S., & Quintana, Y. (2014). IT and agility in the social enterprise: A case study of st jude children’s research hospital’s “Cure4Kids” IT-platform for international outreach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00351

Romani-Dias, M., Iizuka, E. S., Walchhutter, S., & Barbosa, A. S. (2017). Agenda de Pesquisa em Empreendedorismo Social e Negócios Sociais. Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia da Fundace, 8(3), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13059/racef.v8i3.156

Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196

Salavou, H., & Cohen, S. (2020). Towards a Typology of Social Enterprises Based on Performance: Some New Evidence. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1718743

Scarlata, M., Zacharakis, A., & Walske, J. (2016). The effect of founder experience on the performance of philanthropic venture capital firms. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 618-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615574588

Shin, C., & Park, J. (2019). How social entrepreneurs’ value orientation affects the performance of social enterprises in Korea: The mediating effect of social entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 11(19), 5341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195341

Silva, A. P. A., & Gonçalves-dias, S. L. F. (2015). Mensuração de desempenho socioambiental: estudo de casos em negócios sociais brasileiros. Pensamento & Realidade, 30(2), 117-151.

Silva, C. S., & Iizuka, E. S. (2018). Mapeamento de negócios sociais e organizações congêneres no Brasil. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 20(52), 123-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2018V20n52p123

Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201323327

Son, H., Lee, J., & Chung, Y. (2018). Value creation mechanism of social enterprises in manufacturing industry: Empirical evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(1), 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010046

Spell (2021). Características. Recuperado em 28 agosto de 2021, de http://www.spell.org.br/sobre/caracteristicas

Spencer, R., Brueckner, M., Wise, G., & Marika, B. (2016). Australian indigenous social enterprise: measuring performance. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 10(4), 397-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-10-2015-0050

Staessens, M., Kerstens, P. J., Bruneel, J., & Cherchye, L. (2019). Data envelopment analysis and social enterprises: analysing performance, strategic orientation and mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 325-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4046-4

Stevens, R., Moray, N., & Bruneel, J. (2015). The social and economic mission of social enterprises: Dimensions, measurement, validation, and relation. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 39(5), 1051-1082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12091

Straub, A., Koopman, M., & Mossel, H. J. V. (2010). Systems approach and performance measurement by social enterprises. Facilities, 28(5-6), 321-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011031547

Tate, W. L., & Bals, L. (2018). Achieving shared triple bottom line (TBL) value creation: toward a social resource-based view (SRBV) of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 803-826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3344-y

Tirumalsety, R., & Gurtoo, A. (2019). Financial sources, capital structure and performance of social enterprises: empirical evidence from India. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2019.1619337

Van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010

Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 308-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005

Zheng, C., & Kouwenberg, R. (2019). A bibliometric review of global research on corporate governance and board attributes. Sustainability, 11(12), 3428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123428

Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629