Enlightenment, Critical Theory, and the Role of Business Schools in the Anthropocene
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Anthropocene
Critical Theory
Business Schools

Como Citar

Nogueira, J. M. M. ., Rodrigues, . C. C. C. ., & Aguiar, A. C. (2021). Enlightenment, Critical Theory, and the Role of Business Schools in the Anthropocene. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 15, e02816. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v15.2816

Resumo

Purpose: This article analyses relations between the Dialectic of Enlightenment, critical theory, and the Anthropocene, and poses the question: How do the Dialectic of Enlightenment and critical theory relate to the Anthropocene? Moreover, what is the role of business schools and critical management studies in the context of the Anthropocene?

 Theoretical framework: The Dialectic of Enlightenment questioned why advancements in rationality and technology failed to lead humanity to emancipation. Moreover, advancements in rationality and technology have led to the Anthropocene: a new geological age marked by the human capacity to modify the climate and ecosystems of Planet Earth. This debate, which is related to fields such as sustainability, organisations, and management, can be held in business schools.

 Method/design/approach: To discuss this theme, we compose a theoretical essay.

 Results and conclusion: The shock of the Anthropocene has provoked the need to think differently about social and environmental issues and to declare humanity as being responsible for nature. However, this response can neither be naïve nor generalised; it cannot place the responsibility for the Anthropocene on every human being equally. That would also reduce the significance of the human struggle to both acknowledge and solve the current climate and nature issues. We propose five dimensions where business schools could advance to foster critical thinking in the Anthropocene: curriculum, institutional practices, academic staff, the educational system, and subjectivity.

 Research implications: Critical management studies (CMS) and business schools are two important players that can use the Anthropocene-induced perspective shift to think differently about social and environmental issues.

 Originality/value: We show that CMS can use the Anthropocene shock to reinforce itself and gain greater legitimacy to critically analyse modern methods of organising the human society. Business schools also need to review their current practices for educating future managers who need to be aware of their environmental impact both as human beings and as professionals.

https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v15.2816
PDF (English)

Referências

Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies. The Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 432–464.

Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2005.19417904

Andersson, L. (2017). Of Great Vampire Squids and Jamming Blood Funnels: A Socially Constructed and Historically Situated Perspective on Organizational Corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616670755

Ansari, S. (Shaz), Wijen, F., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a Climate Change Logic: An Institutional Perspective on the “Tragedy of the Commons.” Organization Science, 24(4), 1014–1040. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0799

Anthropocene Working Group. (2019). Results of binding vote by AWG Released. http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/working-groups/anthropocene/

Artaxo, P. (2014). Uma nova era geológica em nosso planeta: o Antropoceno? Revista USP, 103, 13. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i103p13-24

Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623

Banerjee, S. B., & Arjaliès, D.-L. (2021). Celebrating the End of Enlightenment: Organization Theory in the Age of the Anthropocene and Gaia (and why neither is the solution to our ecological crisis). Organization Theory, 2(4), 263178772110367. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211036714

Baskin, J. (2015). Paradigm Dressed as Epoch: The Ideology of the Anthropocene. Environmental Values, 24(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14183182353746

Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104, 154. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15929407

Brenkert, G. G. (1995). “The Environment, The Moralist, The Corporation and its Culture.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(4), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857409

Cornuel, E. (2005). The role of business schools in society. Journal of Management Development, 24(9), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510621321

Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Polity.

Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind: the Anthropocene. Nature, 415(23).

Dalby, S. (2014). Rethinking Geopolitics: Climate Security in the Anthropocene. Global Policy, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12074

Davis, G. F. (2015). Editorial Essay What Is Organizational Research For? Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215585725

Duarte, R. (2002). Adorno/Horkheimer & A Dialética do Esclarecimento. Zahar.

Faoro, R. (2012). Os Donos do Poder (5a). Globo.

Gardiner, L., & Lacy, P. (2005). Lead, respond, partner or ignore: the role of business schools on corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510562749

Harari, Y. (2014). Sapiens: Uma breve história da humanidade. L&PM Pocket.

Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T. W., & Noeri, G. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press.

Johnsen, C., Nelund, M., Olaison, L., & Sørensen, B. (2017). Organizing for the post-growth economy. Ephemera, 17(1), 1.

Kivivirta, V. (2018). The shock of the Anthropocene and a margin of hope : On possibilities for critical thinking in the Arctic context. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 18(3), 659–671.

Klikauer, T. (2015). Critical management studies and critical theory: A review. Capital & Class, 39(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816815581773

Koris, R., Örtenblad, A., & Ojala, T. (2017). From maintaining the status quo to promoting free thinking and inquiry: Business students’ perspective on the purpose of business school teaching. Management Learning, 48(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507616668480

Langenberg, S. (2004). Parrèsiastic stakeholders: A different approach to ethical institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039398.96906.41

Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258

Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019613516291

Mandiola, M. P. (2010). Latin America’s critical management? A liberation genealogy. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 6(2/3), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/17422041011049978

Mawere, M. (2013). A Critical Review of Environmental Conservation in Zimbabwe. Africa Spectrum, 48(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/000203971304800205

Mikhail, A. (2016). Enlightenment Anthropocene. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 49(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2016.0002

Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G., & Bedeian, A. G. (2011). Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(5), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751

Nunes, J. (2020). A pandemia de COVID-19: securitização, crise neoliberal e a vulnerabilização global. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 36(5). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00063120

Perez, C. (2015). Capitalism, Technology and a Green Global Golden Age: The Role of History in Helping to Shape the Future. The Political Quarterly, 86, 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12240

Reedy, P. (2008). Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall: Reflecting on the Ethics and Effects of a Collective Critical Management Studies Identity Project. Management Learning, 39(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607085978

Robinson, N. A. (2012). Beyond sustainability: environmental management for the Anthropocene Epoch. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1432

Rodrigues, C. C., & Barros, A. (2020). From Caciques and Godfathers to Second-Order Corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 105649262090178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620901780

Shrivastava, P. (1995). The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280026

Singer, D. (2018). Molecular Red : Wark’ s Marxist-posthumanist perspective on the Anthropocene. Ephemera, 18(4), 831–836.

Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785

Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621.

Wittneben, B. B. F., Okereke, C., Banerjee, S. B., & Levy, D. L. (2012). Climate Change and the Emergence of New Organizational Landscapes. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1431–1450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612464612

Wright, C., Nyberg, D., Rickards, L., & Freund, J. (2018). Organizing in the Anthropocene. Organization, 25(4), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418779649

Zald, M. N., & Lounsbury, M. (2010). The Wizards of Oz: Towards an Institutional Approach to Elites, Expertise and Command Posts. Organization Studies, 31(7), 963–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610373201

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Marcelo Maia, Caio Coelho, Ana Carolina Aguiar

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...